Followers

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

4th Annotation Dred Scott

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/a/part4/4h2933.html. 1857. PBS online

In March of 1857, the United States Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, declared that all blacks (slaves as well as free) were not and could never become citizens of the United States. The court also declared the 1820 Missouri Compromise unconstitutional, thus permitting slavery in all of the country's territories.The case before the court was that of Dred Scott v. Sanford. Dred Scott, a slave who had lived in the free state of Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving back to the slave state of Missouri, had came to the Supreme Court in hopes of being granted for his freedom. Taney which was a supporter of slavery and intent on protecting southerners from northern aggression wrote in the Court's majority opinion that, because Scott was black, he was not a citizen and therefore had no right to sue. But Dred Scott sued anyway and lost his first case but later won his second one.
163 words


This website was helpful to my knowledge on Dred Scott because, it helped me form my first two paragraphs of my paper on him. This was a secondary source because it told me what happened during those years, it did not tell me exactly what happened. The intended audience I think was African Americans and judges or juries.

Saturday, October 25, 2008

Recipe For a Good Mother...(Mr. Romero)

"Didn't I tell you to pick up those clothes off the floor?!" Does that sound familiar? Well that's just an average mom reminding a child to pick up clothes off the floor. But I have a recipe for an extremely good mother. A mother who has surpluses of love for the child, has good communication in the relationship, and trusts and supports their child, in just about anything they do.

In order to create a good mother, there must be 100 cups of love in the relationship. The mother must care and have love for their child, no matter what. If a child does something bad like get suspended from school, the mother can't get extremely mad and tell the child that she hates them. A good mother will make mends with them, probably put them on punishment but still love them. That's their child, and children sometimes make mistakes. But the mother should always adore them.

Another ingredient that you must add in order to create a good mother is 1 and 3/4 cups of communication. A good mother has a good relationship with a child through communication. A good mother can simply ask a child, "How was your day?", or "What did they do in school?" Simple questions like that can make a good mother and child's relationship blossom and grow very strong. For instance, if a child was having a horrible day or was not feeling good, if the mother just asks the child "how was their day", it could easily fix their day and it will make them feel that they have a mother who cares and loves for them. In the story "The Night I Won the Right to the Streets of Memphis", by Richard Wright the mother did not communicate properly with her child Richard when he got beat up by the gang. She kept constantly telling him to go back outside and get the groceries. She did not listen to his side of the story of what was happening every time he went outside and tried to get the groceries.

The last ingredients needed to make a good mother are 2 full cups of trust and a pinch of support. Trusting your child can make you a great parent. If you allow your child to do certain things; go outside, go to the movies etc., you trust them to actually do that. Slowly the child will gain trust in you. A good mother also wants to support her child. Lead them on the right path and be open to their suggestions. In "Memphis", the mother was not leading Richard onto the right path when she gave him a stick to defend himself from the gang. She was leading him into becoming a bully. That is not the right way to lead a child. A good mother will lead them into a positive path.

A good mother consists of love, trust, support, and communication. That's all you need in order to create one. Maybe you should create a good father, but this time add a little spice to your own recipe.

Monday, October 20, 2008

Thesis Statement and Introduction for Dred Scott

Born in Southampton, Virgina in the year 1795 was a significant individual named Sam Scott. But he later changed his name to Dred Scott. Dred Scott was very important. He was a main reason of why the civil war began. Mr. Scott was an African American slave, who fought long and hard for his freedom. A lot of struggles and obstacles got in his way but he never gave up. He once had gotten free but was later captured and enslaved again, he also was almost beaten to death trying to escape out of a city and his wife had to suffer some due to his constant tryings to escape.

3rd Annotation for Dred Scott...

Thompson, Gale. "'Black History-Dred Scott"- United States, 2005.

The article I read was about Dred Scott and how he was born in South Hampton, Virginia in 1795. His first original name was "Sam". He was a farmhand, and a handy man. He later moved to Huntsville, Alabama and then St. Louis Missouri. In 1831, his owner Peter Blow died, and a surgeon for the United States military, John Emerson later bought and enslaved him. He moved with John into Illinois than Wisconsin. In 1836, he Dred was allowed to marry which he did. Then in 1848, he changed his name from Sam to Dred Scott. Many of times Dred Scott tried to run away but was always unsuccessful. When John Emerson died, he left his widow Irene Emerson in charge of Dred. She too refused to let him free. He then found two attorneys who helped him sue for his freedom in county court. He lost the first trial but the second trial he won.
157 words

Thursday, October 16, 2008

4 In between the line questions for Mr. Romero

1. What do you think the mom would of gave Richard if she didn't give him the stick?

Some weapons I think the mom would of gave Richard instead of the stick would of been a knife, a bat, or a gun. I think she would of gave him a knife because if the gang would of harmed Richard dramatically he could of stabbed them and hurt them very much. I think she would of gave him a bat because it is similar to the stick that she gave him. And I think that she would of gave him a gun just to kill whomever was bothering him. That is why I think that she would of either gave him a knife, bat or gun instead of a stick.


2. If Richard's father never left, how would the story be different?

I think if the father was to never leave Richard the story would of been very different. I think the father would of taught his son how to be a man in the first place. If the father would of taught Richard this earlier i life I think that Richard would of already been a part of the gang or he could of avoided going back to the mom and getting more money and another note. Basically, if the father was there the story probalbly would of been very different.

3. What is the resolution?

I think the resolution was "never underestimate yourself." I say that that was the resolution because at first when Richard went out to get the groceries he was defenseless and he didn't think that he could defeat the gang. But once his mother gave him that stick, he suddenly became aware of his surroundings and began to hit the gang with the stick and he ended up hurting them. So it was kind of like the story was switched around. He underestimated himself and he ended up coming on top. That is my opinion of the resolution.

4. If Richard hadn't handled the situation the way he did, how would of you suggested he handled the situation?

If Richard didn't handle the situation by using the stick, I think that he could of asked a friend that lived close by him, to walk him to the store and help him fight his way to the store. I don't think that Richard should of used a weapon to help fight his battle. He should of just asked a friend for a little bit of help because some people were extremely injured and it wasn't a fair fight. Those are some ways that he could of handled the situation.

Monday, October 13, 2008

On Line Questions-Mr. Romero

1. What happened after the mother gave Richard the money and note the first time?

After the mother gave Richard the money the first time he began to walk down the street, then ran into a gang, got jumped and the money and the note was stolen from him.

2. How many times did the mother give Richard more money and another note?

The mother gave Richard more money and another note three times.

3. Who was the key character Richard or the gang?

The key character was Richard, because he was the main character because without him, there probably would not be a story.

4. Which is true or false....
Richard had to go to the electronic store to buy a remote control
or
Richard had to go to the market and get some groceries

5. Who spoke to Richard and told him to stand up for himself?

The person who spoke to Richard and told him to stand up for himself was his mother. She gave him a stick to use against the gang, and she told him to go to the grocery store and get the groceries or else he would not be coming back into the house and she was going to whoop him.

6. What did the gang take away from Richard?

The gang took the money that the mother gave Richard and the note that had the groceries needed written on it.

7. Can you remember the city that the boy lived in?

The city that Richard lived in was Memphis.

8. Can you tell me what the mother wanted the boy to get from the store?

The mother wanted Richard to get some groceries.

9. Where did the story take place?

The story took place in Memphis on dark streets and on the steps towards his house.

10. What did Richard use to hit the gang with?

Richard was given a stick by his mother to defend himself and that's what he used to hit the gang with.

Monday, October 6, 2008

2nd Annotation of Dred Scott

"The Dred Scott Decision." The History Place. Boston: Gavin,Philip, 1996.


The article that I have recently read was about Dred Scott, and how he moved to the free state of Illinois. For years he was living on free land. But his old owner came and took him back to a slave state which was Missouri. Once he arrived in the slave state he was no longer free. He had to work for his recent owner again with out pay and go along with his owner as his slave master. But by the year 1847, Dred Scott thought that he had the right to sue his owner for freedom. Which he decided to do.Once he sued for his freedom, he caught back up with his wife and kids, but could only stay in Illinois.
123 words

This article was helpful to me because it gave me a little bit more information on Dred Scott's background. I think this article was a secondary source.