Followers
Monday, April 5, 2010
Do Now "Be the change you wish to see in the world."
I think this statement means that if you want a change in the world you need to start with yourself. You need to be a leader and let people follow you into the right path. If you lead others to make a positive change than most likely they will follow that path and make a positive change too.
Thursday, March 18, 2010
My Opinion On the School Article
I do not agree with Dr. Ackerman's plan for the school system. This is not a good plan because it is going to run the middle-class families out of the city. If a student deserves and earned the place of attending that school, they should be allowed. I am for funding the neighborhood schools and everything, but the school system should remain the way it is.
Friday, January 29, 2010
My reflections on HAITI
I watched the video and found it to be very sad. I wish that I could help them more than what my family already done , but there is not much that I can do . My family sent money to them like a week ago, and we are gathering clothes and water together so we can send down. I even sent 5 dollars through a text commercial so that they can have more money for medical needs.
Friday, January 22, 2010
How my year been so far . . . . .
So far this school year has been alright. The beginning was good but towards the end of the semester I began to get stressed. NHD took a toll on me , and I feel as though it was too much.
Wednesday, December 3, 2008
Huckleberry Finn Beyond the Line Essay
Do you think Huckleberry Finn would be able to survive in Philadelphia?
I honestly think that Huckleberry Finn would be able to survive in Philadelphia. I simply believe this because he is smart, has a good imagination and can quickly adapt to new surroundings. Huckleberry has the qualities of being able to live Philadelphia.
Huckleberry is very smart. When I say smart I don't exactly mean braniac smart, I mean common sense smart. Huck knows how to make his way around quickly and he knows how to search for food and other survival things. In the book The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, by Mark Twain Huck was kidnapped by his father Pap, and Huck had common sense to escape once the father was drunk and passed out. Huck knew that he wasn't going to be able to live with his father so he had common sense to leave him.
One particular thing reason why I think Huckleberry would be able to survive in Philadelphia is because he has a good imagination. The reason why I think he has a good imagination is because back when the book was written there wasn't televisions or radios, etc., and if he was to come to Philadelphia he already would be use to not doing those type of things and he would be ready to find a job, and he will be ready to learn how to stay on his feet.
The last reason why I think that Huck will be able to survive in Philadelphia is because he can adapt to almost any surrounding or climate. In the book, Huck was living with the widow and he learned how to adjust to her lifestyle and the things she told him to do, and when Pap kidnapped him, he learned how to live with his father and adapt to his lifestyle. So if Huck was to come to Philadelphia I think that he would be able to adapt easily and quickly and get the hang of how Philadelphia works.
Therefore, I think that Huckleberry Finn would be able to survive in Philadelphia because he is smart, has a good imagination, and can adapt to almost any surrounding. If Huck can survive in Philadelphia, do you think that you would be able to survive in a diffrenet city, state, or even a country?
I honestly think that Huckleberry Finn would be able to survive in Philadelphia. I simply believe this because he is smart, has a good imagination and can quickly adapt to new surroundings. Huckleberry has the qualities of being able to live Philadelphia.
Huckleberry is very smart. When I say smart I don't exactly mean braniac smart, I mean common sense smart. Huck knows how to make his way around quickly and he knows how to search for food and other survival things. In the book The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, by Mark Twain Huck was kidnapped by his father Pap, and Huck had common sense to escape once the father was drunk and passed out. Huck knew that he wasn't going to be able to live with his father so he had common sense to leave him.
One particular thing reason why I think Huckleberry would be able to survive in Philadelphia is because he has a good imagination. The reason why I think he has a good imagination is because back when the book was written there wasn't televisions or radios, etc., and if he was to come to Philadelphia he already would be use to not doing those type of things and he would be ready to find a job, and he will be ready to learn how to stay on his feet.
The last reason why I think that Huck will be able to survive in Philadelphia is because he can adapt to almost any surrounding or climate. In the book, Huck was living with the widow and he learned how to adjust to her lifestyle and the things she told him to do, and when Pap kidnapped him, he learned how to live with his father and adapt to his lifestyle. So if Huck was to come to Philadelphia I think that he would be able to adapt easily and quickly and get the hang of how Philadelphia works.
Therefore, I think that Huckleberry Finn would be able to survive in Philadelphia because he is smart, has a good imagination, and can adapt to almost any surrounding. If Huck can survive in Philadelphia, do you think that you would be able to survive in a diffrenet city, state, or even a country?
Wednesday, November 5, 2008
REFLECTIONS OF OBAMA WINNING
I am extremely happy to know that Barack Obama won to be president of the United States. This means a lot to me. It means a lot to me because I am an African American person and knowing that someone like me can accomplish something major like that makes me feel good. My family especially my parents are very excited to see what Obama can do in presidency. We supported him from the very beginning. He carries himself well and I am proud to say that I trust him with our country.
Tuesday, October 28, 2008
Rought Draft for NHD on Dred Scott
Sam Scott better known as Dred Scott was an important person during the 1800's. His famous court case helped hasten the arrival of the American Civil War. The court case between Mr. Dred Scott and Stanford was relatively significant during the 1800's because the Northern and Southern states has been struggling for decades about what to do about slavery. Of course the states later came up with a decision that the slaves did not agree with or like. They came up with a series of bills called the Compromise of 1850. This Compromise only allowed certain states like California, Texas and Illinois to be free states while the rest of the sates had to be slave states. Slaves including Dred Scott found this compromise unfair and cruel.
The slaves later began to get so fed up with the Compromise of 1850, that they began rebelling against their masters. Dred Scott even decided to escape from his master James Emerson who was a doctor for the United States soldiers. Dred Scott originally resided in St. Louis Missouri, which obviously was a slave state. But he escaped to Illinois a free state in 1856. He then left Illinois to go to Fort Snelling near Wisconsin Territory, where the Missouri Compromise prohibited slavery. The Missouri Compromise was measures passed by the United States Congress to end the first of a series of crisis concerning the extensions of slavery. This was good for the slaves because it gave them an opportunity to escape their slave homes and seek new things in other states. However when Dred Scott decided to take that risk, he accomplished it at first but was later found by his original owner James Emerson. James Emerson found him in Wisconsin and brought him back to Missouri. But what James Emerson did not know was that Dred Scott had married an African American woman named Harriet. So she too had to be bought back to Missouri and had to work for James Emerson and his family.
Once Dred Scott, Harriet Scott and the Emerson family arrived back to Missouri, the Scott's decided to sue for their freedom. It was a long process but they finally made it possible to sue. The first Dred Scott case was first brought to trial in 1847 on the first floor, west wing courtroom of St. Louis' Courthouse. This case was lost because Dred Scott had evidence to prove that he was free, but the jury and judge did not take the Dred Scott case serious. However, the judge granted the Scott's a second trial. The second trial was held in the same courtroom but in the year 1850. By this time James Emerson died and Dred Scott and Harriet Scott was property of James' wife Irene Emerson. She did not want to lose Dred and his wife at all because she claimed that they were great workers and she wanted them to work for her children. So when the Scott's went to the second trial and was granted freedom, Irene decided to take it to the United States Missouri Supreme Ruling in 1852.
This particular trial took place in an Old courthouse, where the judges were cruel and mean. But Dred Scott did not care, he was determined to fight for his freedom. Dred Scott and his wife found a new set of lawyers who absolutely hated slavery and was willing to represent them at no cost. They helped him sue against John F.A. Sanford, Irene's brother in 1854. But since Sanford lived in New York, the case had to be moved again to a Federal District Courtroom because of the diversity in the residence. The trial ruled in favor of Sanford, but Dred Scott still did not give up. He later took it to the United States Supreme Court.
On March 6th, 1857, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney delivered the majority opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court in the Dred Scott case. Seven of the nine juries agreed that Dred Scott should remain a slave, but Taney did not stop there. He also ruled that as a slave, Dred Scott was not a citizen of the United States, and therefore had no right to bring suit in the federal courts on any matter. In addition, he declared that Scott had never been free, due to the fact that slaves were personal property and that the Missouri Compromise of 1820 was unconstitutional, and the Federal Government had no right to prohibit slavery in the new territories. The court appeared to be sanctioning slavery under the terms of the Constitution itself, and saying that slavery could not be outlawed or restricted within the United States. That is when the rest of the United States began to hear about this case. Antislavery groups feared that slavery would spread rapidly. The new Republican Party, founded in 1854 to prohibit the spread of slavery, renewed their fight to gain control of the Congress and the courts. Their well planned political campaign of 1860, coupled with numerous of issues, which split the Democratic Party, led to the election of Abraham Lincoln as President of the United States and South Carolina's secession from the Union. The Dred Scott Decision moved the country to the brink of Civil War.
Ironically, Irene Emerson remarried in 1850 to a man name Calvin C. Chaffee, a northren congressman who was opposed to slavery. After the Supreme Court decision, Mrs. Chaffee turned Dred and Harriet Scott and their two daughters over to Dred's old friends, the Blows, who gave the Scotts their freedom in May 1857. On September 17, 1858, Dred Scott died of tuberculosis and was buried in St. Louis. His grave was moved in the 1860s to Calvary Cemetery in northern St. Louis, and marked due to the efforts of the Rev. Edward Dowling in 1957. Dred Scott did not live to see the fratricidal war touched off at Fort Sumter in 1861, but did live to gain his freedom. The ultimate result of the war, the end of slavery throughout the United States, was not something Dred Scott could have foreseen in 1846, when he decided to sue for his freedom in St. Louis' Old Courthouse.
The slaves later began to get so fed up with the Compromise of 1850, that they began rebelling against their masters. Dred Scott even decided to escape from his master James Emerson who was a doctor for the United States soldiers. Dred Scott originally resided in St. Louis Missouri, which obviously was a slave state. But he escaped to Illinois a free state in 1856. He then left Illinois to go to Fort Snelling near Wisconsin Territory, where the Missouri Compromise prohibited slavery. The Missouri Compromise was measures passed by the United States Congress to end the first of a series of crisis concerning the extensions of slavery. This was good for the slaves because it gave them an opportunity to escape their slave homes and seek new things in other states. However when Dred Scott decided to take that risk, he accomplished it at first but was later found by his original owner James Emerson. James Emerson found him in Wisconsin and brought him back to Missouri. But what James Emerson did not know was that Dred Scott had married an African American woman named Harriet. So she too had to be bought back to Missouri and had to work for James Emerson and his family.
Once Dred Scott, Harriet Scott and the Emerson family arrived back to Missouri, the Scott's decided to sue for their freedom. It was a long process but they finally made it possible to sue. The first Dred Scott case was first brought to trial in 1847 on the first floor, west wing courtroom of St. Louis' Courthouse. This case was lost because Dred Scott had evidence to prove that he was free, but the jury and judge did not take the Dred Scott case serious. However, the judge granted the Scott's a second trial. The second trial was held in the same courtroom but in the year 1850. By this time James Emerson died and Dred Scott and Harriet Scott was property of James' wife Irene Emerson. She did not want to lose Dred and his wife at all because she claimed that they were great workers and she wanted them to work for her children. So when the Scott's went to the second trial and was granted freedom, Irene decided to take it to the United States Missouri Supreme Ruling in 1852.
This particular trial took place in an Old courthouse, where the judges were cruel and mean. But Dred Scott did not care, he was determined to fight for his freedom. Dred Scott and his wife found a new set of lawyers who absolutely hated slavery and was willing to represent them at no cost. They helped him sue against John F.A. Sanford, Irene's brother in 1854. But since Sanford lived in New York, the case had to be moved again to a Federal District Courtroom because of the diversity in the residence. The trial ruled in favor of Sanford, but Dred Scott still did not give up. He later took it to the United States Supreme Court.
On March 6th, 1857, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney delivered the majority opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court in the Dred Scott case. Seven of the nine juries agreed that Dred Scott should remain a slave, but Taney did not stop there. He also ruled that as a slave, Dred Scott was not a citizen of the United States, and therefore had no right to bring suit in the federal courts on any matter. In addition, he declared that Scott had never been free, due to the fact that slaves were personal property and that the Missouri Compromise of 1820 was unconstitutional, and the Federal Government had no right to prohibit slavery in the new territories. The court appeared to be sanctioning slavery under the terms of the Constitution itself, and saying that slavery could not be outlawed or restricted within the United States. That is when the rest of the United States began to hear about this case. Antislavery groups feared that slavery would spread rapidly. The new Republican Party, founded in 1854 to prohibit the spread of slavery, renewed their fight to gain control of the Congress and the courts. Their well planned political campaign of 1860, coupled with numerous of issues, which split the Democratic Party, led to the election of Abraham Lincoln as President of the United States and South Carolina's secession from the Union. The Dred Scott Decision moved the country to the brink of Civil War.
Ironically, Irene Emerson remarried in 1850 to a man name Calvin C. Chaffee, a northren congressman who was opposed to slavery. After the Supreme Court decision, Mrs. Chaffee turned Dred and Harriet Scott and their two daughters over to Dred's old friends, the Blows, who gave the Scotts their freedom in May 1857. On September 17, 1858, Dred Scott died of tuberculosis and was buried in St. Louis. His grave was moved in the 1860s to Calvary Cemetery in northern St. Louis, and marked due to the efforts of the Rev. Edward Dowling in 1957. Dred Scott did not live to see the fratricidal war touched off at Fort Sumter in 1861, but did live to gain his freedom. The ultimate result of the war, the end of slavery throughout the United States, was not something Dred Scott could have foreseen in 1846, when he decided to sue for his freedom in St. Louis' Old Courthouse.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
