My reflections on HAITI

I watched the video and found it to be very sad. I wish that I could help them more than what my family already done , but there is not much that I can do . My family sent money to them like a week ago, and we are gathering clothes and water together so we can send down. I even sent 5 dollars through a text commercial so that they can have more money for medical needs.

How my year been so far . . . . .

So far this school year has been alright. The beginning was good but towards the end of the semester I began to get stressed. NHD took a toll on me , and I feel as though it was too much.

Huckleberry Finn Beyond the Line Essay

Do you think Huckleberry Finn would be able to survive in Philadelphia?

I honestly think that Huckleberry Finn would be able to survive in Philadelphia. I simply believe this because he is smart, has a good imagination and can quickly adapt to new surroundings. Huckleberry has the qualities of being able to live Philadelphia.

Huckleberry is very smart. When I say smart I don't exactly mean braniac smart, I mean common sense smart. Huck knows how to make his way around quickly and he knows how to search for food and other survival things. In the book The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, by Mark Twain Huck was kidnapped by his father Pap, and Huck had common sense to escape once the father was drunk and passed out. Huck knew that he wasn't going to be able to live with his father so he had common sense to leave him.

One particular thing reason why I think Huckleberry would be able to survive in Philadelphia is because he has a good imagination. The reason why I think he has a good imagination is because back when the book was written there wasn't televisions or radios, etc., and if he was to come to Philadelphia he already would be use to not doing those type of things and he would be ready to find a job, and he will be ready to learn how to stay on his feet.

The last reason why I think that Huck will be able to survive in Philadelphia is because he can adapt to almost any surrounding or climate. In the book, Huck was living with the widow and he learned how to adjust to her lifestyle and the things she told him to do, and when Pap kidnapped him, he learned how to live with his father and adapt to his lifestyle. So if Huck was to come to Philadelphia I think that he would be able to adapt easily and quickly and get the hang of how Philadelphia works.

Therefore, I think that Huckleberry Finn would be able to survive in Philadelphia because he is smart, has a good imagination, and can adapt to almost any surrounding. If Huck can survive in Philadelphia, do you think that you would be able to survive in a diffrenet city, state, or even a country?

REFLECTIONS OF OBAMA WINNING

I am extremely happy to know that Barack Obama won to be president of the United States. This means a lot to me. It means a lot to me because I am an African American person and knowing that someone like me can accomplish something major like that makes me feel good. My family especially my parents are very excited to see what Obama can do in presidency. We supported him from the very beginning. He carries himself well and I am proud to say that I trust him with our country.

Rought Draft for NHD on Dred Scott

Sam Scott better known as Dred Scott was an important person during the 1800's. His famous court case helped hasten the arrival of the American Civil War. The court case between Mr. Dred Scott and Stanford was relatively significant during the 1800's because the Northern and Southern states has been struggling for decades about what to do about slavery. Of course the states later came up with a decision that the slaves did not agree with or like. They came up with a series of bills called the Compromise of 1850. This Compromise only allowed certain states like California, Texas and Illinois to be free states while the rest of the sates had to be slave states. Slaves including Dred Scott found this compromise unfair and cruel.

The slaves later began to get so fed up with the Compromise of 1850, that they began rebelling against their masters. Dred Scott even decided to escape from his master James Emerson who was a doctor for the United States soldiers. Dred Scott originally resided in St. Louis Missouri, which obviously was a slave state. But he escaped to Illinois a free state in 1856. He then left Illinois to go to Fort Snelling near Wisconsin Territory, where the Missouri Compromise prohibited slavery. The Missouri Compromise was measures passed by the United States Congress to end the first of a series of crisis concerning the extensions of slavery. This was good for the slaves because it gave them an opportunity to escape their slave homes and seek new things in other states. However when Dred Scott decided to take that risk, he accomplished it at first but was later found by his original owner James Emerson. James Emerson found him in Wisconsin and brought him back to Missouri. But what James Emerson did not know was that Dred Scott had married an African American woman named Harriet. So she too had to be bought back to Missouri and had to work for James Emerson and his family.

Once Dred Scott, Harriet Scott and the Emerson family arrived back to Missouri, the Scott's decided to sue for their freedom. It was a long process but they finally made it possible to sue. The first Dred Scott case was first brought to trial in 1847 on the first floor, west wing courtroom of St. Louis' Courthouse. This case was lost because Dred Scott had evidence to prove that he was free, but the jury and judge did not take the Dred Scott case serious. However, the judge granted the Scott's a second trial. The second trial was held in the same courtroom but in the year 1850. By this time James Emerson died and Dred Scott and Harriet Scott was property of James' wife Irene Emerson. She did not want to lose Dred and his wife at all because she claimed that they were great workers and she wanted them to work for her children. So when the Scott's went to the second trial and was granted freedom, Irene decided to take it to the United States Missouri Supreme Ruling in 1852.

This particular trial took place in an Old courthouse, where the judges were cruel and mean. But Dred Scott did not care, he was determined to fight for his freedom. Dred Scott and his wife found a new set of lawyers who absolutely hated slavery and was willing to represent them at no cost. They helped him sue against John F.A. Sanford, Irene's brother in 1854. But since Sanford lived in New York, the case had to be moved again to a Federal District Courtroom because of the diversity in the residence. The trial ruled in favor of Sanford, but Dred Scott still did not give up. He later took it to the United States Supreme Court.

On March 6th, 1857, Chief Justice Roger B. Taney delivered the majority opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court in the Dred Scott case. Seven of the nine juries agreed that Dred Scott should remain a slave, but Taney did not stop there. He also ruled that as a slave, Dred Scott was not a citizen of the United States, and therefore had no right to bring suit in the federal courts on any matter. In addition, he declared that Scott had never been free, due to the fact that slaves were personal property and that the Missouri Compromise of 1820 was unconstitutional, and the Federal Government had no right to prohibit slavery in the new territories. The court appeared to be sanctioning slavery under the terms of the Constitution itself, and saying that slavery could not be outlawed or restricted within the United States. That is when the rest of the United States began to hear about this case. Antislavery groups feared that slavery would spread rapidly. The new Republican Party, founded in 1854 to prohibit the spread of slavery, renewed their fight to gain control of the Congress and the courts. Their well planned political campaign of 1860, coupled with numerous of issues, which split the Democratic Party, led to the election of Abraham Lincoln as President of the United States and South Carolina's secession from the Union. The Dred Scott Decision moved the country to the brink of Civil War.

Ironically, Irene Emerson remarried in 1850 to a man name Calvin C. Chaffee, a northren congressman who was opposed to slavery. After the Supreme Court decision, Mrs. Chaffee turned Dred and Harriet Scott and their two daughters over to Dred's old friends, the Blows, who gave the Scotts their freedom in May 1857. On September 17, 1858, Dred Scott died of tuberculosis and was buried in St. Louis. His grave was moved in the 1860s to Calvary Cemetery in northern St. Louis, and marked due to the efforts of the Rev. Edward Dowling in 1957. Dred Scott did not live to see the fratricidal war touched off at Fort Sumter in 1861, but did live to gain his freedom. The ultimate result of the war, the end of slavery throughout the United States, was not something Dred Scott could have foreseen in 1846, when he decided to sue for his freedom in St. Louis' Old Courthouse.

4th Annotation Dred Scott

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/a/part4/4h2933.html. 1857. PBS online

In March of 1857, the United States Supreme Court, led by Chief Justice Roger B. Taney, declared that all blacks (slaves as well as free) were not and could never become citizens of the United States. The court also declared the 1820 Missouri Compromise unconstitutional, thus permitting slavery in all of the country's territories.The case before the court was that of Dred Scott v. Sanford. Dred Scott, a slave who had lived in the free state of Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving back to the slave state of Missouri, had came to the Supreme Court in hopes of being granted for his freedom. Taney which was a supporter of slavery and intent on protecting southerners from northern aggression wrote in the Court's majority opinion that, because Scott was black, he was not a citizen and therefore had no right to sue. But Dred Scott sued anyway and lost his first case but later won his second one.
163 words


This website was helpful to my knowledge on Dred Scott because, it helped me form my first two paragraphs of my paper on him. This was a secondary source because it told me what happened during those years, it did not tell me exactly what happened. The intended audience I think was African Americans and judges or juries.

Recipe For a Good Mother...(Mr. Romero)

"Didn't I tell you to pick up those clothes off the floor?!" Does that sound familiar? Well that's just an average mom reminding a child to pick up clothes off the floor. But I have a recipe for an extremely good mother. A mother who has surpluses of love for the child, has good communication in the relationship, and trusts and supports their child, in just about anything they do.

In order to create a good mother, there must be 100 cups of love in the relationship. The mother must care and have love for their child, no matter what. If a child does something bad like get suspended from school, the mother can't get extremely mad and tell the child that she hates them. A good mother will make mends with them, probably put them on punishment but still love them. That's their child, and children sometimes make mistakes. But the mother should always adore them.

Another ingredient that you must add in order to create a good mother is 1 and 3/4 cups of communication. A good mother has a good relationship with a child through communication. A good mother can simply ask a child, "How was your day?", or "What did they do in school?" Simple questions like that can make a good mother and child's relationship blossom and grow very strong. For instance, if a child was having a horrible day or was not feeling good, if the mother just asks the child "how was their day", it could easily fix their day and it will make them feel that they have a mother who cares and loves for them. In the story "The Night I Won the Right to the Streets of Memphis", by Richard Wright the mother did not communicate properly with her child Richard when he got beat up by the gang. She kept constantly telling him to go back outside and get the groceries. She did not listen to his side of the story of what was happening every time he went outside and tried to get the groceries.

The last ingredients needed to make a good mother are 2 full cups of trust and a pinch of support. Trusting your child can make you a great parent. If you allow your child to do certain things; go outside, go to the movies etc., you trust them to actually do that. Slowly the child will gain trust in you. A good mother also wants to support her child. Lead them on the right path and be open to their suggestions. In "Memphis", the mother was not leading Richard onto the right path when she gave him a stick to defend himself from the gang. She was leading him into becoming a bully. That is not the right way to lead a child. A good mother will lead them into a positive path.

A good mother consists of love, trust, support, and communication. That's all you need in order to create one. Maybe you should create a good father, but this time add a little spice to your own recipe.